Monday, October 26, 2015

CLOSED FRACTURES: THE ROLE OF GENERAL PRACTITIONER (GP) AND FAMILY MEDICINE IN CLOSED FRACTURES MANAGEMENT AT PUSKESMAS

Armis
Professor in Orthopaedic and Traumatologic
UGM, Sardjito Hospital, Yogjakarta
INDONESIA

INTRODUCTION



Fracture is a discontinuity of bone structures. If the soft tissues around the fracture site are intact is called CLOSED FRACTURE, vice versa the soft tissues and skin around the fracture site are not intact, therefore the fracture site is related with external environment is called OPEN FRACTURE.  The fracture is caused by high energy trauma may produce many fracture fragments is called FRACTURE COMMUNITIVE or produce many regions of bone fractures and also bones in different part of the body is called MULTIPLE FRACTURES. The high energy trauma is associated more than one body system is called MULTIPLE TRAUMA. If fracture is caused by low energy trauma is called FRAGILITY FRACTURE.


                                                   A             B                                      C

Fig. 1 A and B. Open fracture type IIIA of the segmental comminuted distal left femur and open intercondylar left femur fracture T type. C. Open comminuted fracture type IIIA of the left tibial plateau Schatacker VI and fracture lines extend to distal of the tibia (OPEN COMMINUTED OF THE DISTAL LEFT FEMUR and OPEN COMMINUTED OF THE PROXIMAL TIBIA/MULTIPLE FRACTURE)  



EPIDEMIOLOGY

Fig. 2: Overall fracture age and gender distribution (Schwart AF)


Figure 2: The total of in and out patients at the Royal Infirmary of Edinburg (UK) was 5953. The average age of the patients was 49.1 years with gender ratio of 50:50 (the fracture’s incidence in men was 11.67/1000 per year and in women was 10.65/1000 per year).

This graphic showed a relative increasing of the incidence after post menopause women compare with men. The incidences of the young men were an increasing (at 20 years old) then gradually decrease until about 60 years old and it rises again. But the older men peak was lower than the older women (the highest incidence of fracture in women was 49.7/1000 per year between 90 and 99 years of age. In men there were two similar peaks with an incidence of 21.9/1000 per year and 23.2/1000 per year between 90 and 99 years).

Table 1: Estimated risks of fracture at various ages
(van Staa TP, Dennison EM, at al. Bone 29:617-522)

Age
(%)
Any fractures
(%)
Radius/ulna(%)
Femur/hip
(%)
Vertebra
(%)
Lifetime risk women
50
60
70
80
53.2
45.5
36.9
28.6
16.6
14.0
10.4
6.9
11.4
11.6
12.1
12.3
3.1
2.9
2.6
1.9
Lifetime risk men
50
60
70
80
20.7
14.7
11.4
9.6
2.9
2.0
1.4
1.1
3.1
3.1
3.3
3.7
1.2
1.1
1.0
0.8
10 year risk women
50
60
70
80
9.8
13.3
17.0
21.7
3.2
4.9
5.6
5.5
0.3
1.1
3.4
8.7
0.3
0.6
1.3
1.6
10 year risk men
50
60
70
80
7.1
5.7
6.2
8.0
1.1
0.9
0.9
0.9
0.2
0.4
1.4
2.9
0.2
0.3
0.5
0.7

According to table 1 showed lifetime risks of fracture among men and women at 50 – 80 years of ages in UK. At 50 years of age, the remaining life time risk of a fracture at any site was 53.2% among women and 20.7% among men. These fractures fall to 28.6% at age 80 years of ages among women and 9.6% at the same age among men. The specific lifetime risks of the site at 50 years of age were: radius/ulna 16.6%, femur/hip 11.4% and vertebra body 3.1 in women, but radius/ulna 2.9%, femur/hip 3.1%, and vertebra 1.2% in men. Lifetime risks of clinical fractures 50 year old white women in US as follow:
1.      Hip fracture of women was 17% lifetime risk and men was 6%
2.      Wrist fracture of women was 16% lifetime risk and men was 3%
3.      Vertebral fracture of women was 16% lifetime risk and men was 5%
4.      Any fracture of women was > 50% lifetime risk, and men was 16%
5.      Breast cancer was 15% lifetime risk

Table 1 also showed 10 years risks of fracture among men and women at 50 – 80 years of ages. At 50 years of age, the remaining 10 year risk of a fracture at any site was 9.8% among women and 7.1% among men. These fractures increased to 21.7% at age 80 years of ages among women and 7.1% to 8.0% at the same age among men. The specific 10 year risks of the site at 50 years of age were: radius/ulna 3.2%, femur/hip 0.3% and vertebra body 0.3% in women, but radius/ulna 1.1%, femur/hip 0.2%, and vertebra 0.2% in men.

 Fig. 3. Five year risk of fracture: Role of age and gender (Schwart AF)

The epidemiology of osteoporotic fracture is 1.5 million fractures in US annually, 44 million individuals in US at risk for fracture, at age 50 a woman lifetime risk of fracture exceeds combined risk of breast, ovarian & uterine cancer and at age 50 a man’s lifetime risk of fracture exceeds risk of prostate cancer.
The epidemiology of fractures are going to change every year (1%) over the world because an improving social-economic and health care delivery services can give a rise to the elderly population with an increasing the number of fractures in both gender. In elderly women, the main causal of fracture is mainly due to the osteoporosis. There will be further changes in the fractures epidemiology caused by osteoporosis problems and also due to increasing number of elderly, especially hip, proximal humerus and distal radius fractures. (fig. 3 & 4)

Fig. 4. Estimated world population: 1990 and 2050 (Schwart AF)
Early detection, promotion, prevention and treatment of osteoporosis are the primary policy in health care delivery to the community.

PATHOLOGY
Every bone fracture consists of soft tissue damage and bone damage. It is important as a general practitioner and family medicine to recognize these damages for the evaluation and management of the closed fracture patient.   Pathology of soft tissue and bone damage is explained as below:

1.      SOFT TISSUE DAMAGE
The soft tissue injury ranges from minor to massive, for example crush injury. Tscherne classified the soft tissue injuries as: (1) grade 0: it has negligible soft tissue injury. (2) Grade 1: it has superficial abrasion or contusions of soft tissues overlying the fracture site. (3) Grade 2: it has significant contusions to muscle, contaminated skin abrasion, or both type of injury. The bone is usually severe damaged. (4) Grade 3: it has severe injury to soft tissues with significant degloving, crushing, compartment syndrome, or vascular injury.

The soft tissues healing need oxygenation, functional cellular activities, and clean wound without contamination or necrotic tissue. The soft tissue healing is divided into four phases such as: coagulation, inflammation, granulation and scar formation.

2.      BONE DAMAGE
The trauma can produce a discontinuation of bone structures such as incomplete/complete fracture, displaced/undisplaced, stable/unstable, comminuted/segmental, and so on. If the discontinuation of bone structure does not complete is called INCOMPLETE FRACTURE. Transversal of the fracture line usually is called STABLE FRACTURE (fig. 1) because after reduction the fracture fragments undisplaced, but after reposition redisplaced is called UNSTABLE FRACTURE for example oblique or spiral fracture lines. If trauma produces more than2 fragments is called COMMINUTED FRACTURE (fig. 5) or there is a segment is called segmental fracture.
 Fig. 5 Left distal radius fracture with transverse of fracture line (stable fracture), but left distal ulna fracture is comminuted (unstable fracture) because more than 2 fragments

Fracture healing is divided into inflammation phase, callus response (bridging callus and medullary callus) and remodeling phase.

CROSS REFERENCE OF FRACTURE PATIENTS IN INDONESIA

Illustration 3: cross reference of fracture patients


This illustration above shows the patient referring system in Indonesia: (1) the fracture patient refers from accident area to PUSKESMAS or (2) refers from accident area to RSUD (3) or directly from accident area to RSUP/RSN. Some fracture patients consult directly to private hospital or private clinic. At government delivery health care center, the fracture patient request to be managed at private hospital or vice-versa due to a specific reason.  However, some fracture patients prefers to be treated by traditional medicine (bone setter). If there is no improvement they come to the hospital or GP/Family medicine the in the neglected conditions. This is the problem of the epidemiology accuracy in Indonesia because the unknown percentage of the fracture patients was treated by bone setter.

“HOW DO THE GP OR FAMILY MEDICNE MANAGE THE CLOSED FRACTURE PATIENT AT THE PUSKESMAS?”

PUSKESMAS CLOSED FRACTURE MANAGEMENT

The goals of the closed fracture patient are to normalize or to optimize function to the level of before fracture condition. The specific aims are:
1.      Preserve life and decrease mortality rate
2.      Preserve limb
3.      Preserve function, and
4.      Prevent infection

Illustration 4: PUSKESMAS MANAGEMENT


INITIAL ASSESSMENT AND MANAGEMENT


A.    LIFESAVING

The first GP or family medicine should be able to assess AIRWAY, BREATHING, and CIRCULATION of the closed fracture patient.
1.      The AIRWAY EVALUATION, GP or family medicine should always protect the cervical spine by hard collar neck (fig. 6) to prevent movement especially multiple trauma (head injury). Definitive airway must be implemented during resuscitation.




2.      The BREATHING ASSESSMENT, GP or family medicine should always check the ventilation of chest trauma in such condition for example, pneumothorax, hemothorax and flail chest. The aim of the resuscitation is to achieve adequate tissue oxygenation.

3.      CIRCULATION EVALUATION, GP or family medicine should prevent the bleeding. The sign of hemorrhage during the initial assessment include decreased of consciousness level, loss of skin color, and rapid pulse. The physician should be able to estimate blood loss in fracture patients. The estimated blood loss of long bone fracture is about 1.5 units or femur fracture is about 3 units or pelvic fracture is about 3 units. Classification of shock hemorrhagic as follow (table 2)

Table 2. Shock classification
Class
Blood volume loss (%)
Treatment
I
until 15
Fluid replacement
II
15-30
Fluid replacement
III
30-40
Fluid replacement and blood replacement
IV
More than 40
Fluid replacement and  blood replacement

The bleeding must be controlled by general physician or family medicine with immobilize the patient by splint. Fluid resuscitation is done by two large-bore peripheral intravenous lines. Initially resuscitation is 1 to 2 L of Lactated Ringer or normal saline for adult and 20 ml/kg for children. Total replacement of fluid replacement is three times the estimated blood loss and crystalloid solution should be given. The pattern response to fluid replacement treatment can be seen on the table 3 below.

Table 3. Initial fluid resuscitation response
Respon-se
Vital sign
Blood loss
Crystalloid need
Blood need
Rapid
Return to normal
Min. 10-20%
Low
Low
Transient
Improve transiently, recurrent of decreasing blood pressure and increase heart rate
Moderate and ongoing
High
Mode-rate to high
None
Remain abnormal
Severe
(> 40%)
High
Imme-diate

The favorable response to fluid replacement therapy is increased urinary output and adequate urine output in adult which is 0.5 ml/kg/hr or 2.0 ml/kg/hr for in children. The patient has improving state of consciousness, increased peripheral perfusion and change in vital signs such as increased blood pressure and pulse pressure, and decreased pulse rate.

4.      DISABILITY EVALUATION, GP or family medicine should be performed using Glasgow Coma scale calculation as below (table 4)
Table 4: Glasgow Coma Scale
Respose to assessment
             Score
1.      Eye opening:
·         Spontaneous
·         To speech
·         To pain
·         None

              4
              3
             2
             1
2.      best motor response
·         Obeys commond
·         Localized pain
·         Normal withdrawal (flexion)
·         Abnormal withdrawal (flexion)-decorticate
·         Extension-decerebrate
·         None

             6
             5
             4
             3
             2
             1
3.      Verbal response
·         Oriented
·         Confused conversation
·         Inappropriate word
·         Incomprehensible
·         None

             5
             4

             3
             2
             1

GCS is a useful scale but takes a long time to be assessed; therefore AVPU is more simple and rapid method for evaluation of neurologic status patient.
A means Alert
V means Response to vocal stimulus
P means Response to painful stimulus, and
U means Unresponsive

5.      The last is the EXPOSURE, GP or family medicine should be able to assess the patient completely in undress for accurate evaluation but after examination the patient should be covered by blanket to maintain the body temperature (fig. 6).

B.     LIMB THREATENING
1.      GP and family medicine should be able to evaluate the neurovascular of the distal fracture lesion to maintain the viability of the distal lesion. Example: pulse, capillary refill test, skin color, the skin temperature.
2.      GP or family medicine should be able to realign the closed fracture and immobilize by splinting (fig. 7), and then

Fig. 7 Left lower leg splinting/back slab

3.      GP or family medicine should always rechecking of the neurovascular
4.      GP or family medicine should be able to prepare the patient and the transportation to be referred to the RSUD or RSUP/RSN hospital as soon as possible.

C.     DEFINITIVE TREATMENT
The aims of the non-surgical management of soft tissues injuries and fractures include (a) protecting and minimalizing the tissue damage, (b) controlling swelling, (c) reducing pain, and (d) limiting of the loss of function. Because of that, GP or family medicine should be able to facilitate the initial management by using combination method: protecting, rest, ice, compression and elevation (PRICE).

GP or family medicine should able to apply the non-surgical management include (1) cryotherapy with using of cold is as initial management of choice for injuries for minimizing secondary cell death from hypoxia and reducing of pain. Cooling of tissue around the fracture site decreases the metabolic activity by reducing the oxygen demand therefore allowing injured cells in that area to survive. (2) Compression and elevation are more helpful in reducing initial swelling because it can reduce the amount of space of fluid accumulation. (3) Thermotherapy such as superficial heating, ultrasound and electrical stimulation are effective tools in rehabilitation procedure. Thermotherapy can increase blood flow and muscle temperature to stimulate analgesia, stimulating cellular metabolism to increase the electricity of muscle, tendon, and ligamentous tissues, increasing nutrition to cellular level and increasing lymphatic drainage for removing of metabolites and others products of the inflammatory process. Thermotherapy can be used during fracture repair.

GP or family medicine should be able to manage soft tissues injures, incomplete and undisplaced fractures in normal alignment by casting immobilization two joints closed the fracture site (proximal and distal joint) until union is achieved for adult patients (3 months for a long bone in adults or 6 weeks in children). The union in children is more rapid compared to adult. Incomplete and undisplaced fractures in children, the GP and family medicine should be able to pull to normalize the alignment and then casting.

D.    ANTIBIOTIC OR SYMPTOMATIC/PALLIATIVE TREATMENT
GP or family medicine should be able to prevent infection by giving prophylaxis antibiotic especially patient with excoriation or skin abrasion around the fracture site (Tscherne grade ≥ 1). Pain killer should be given to minimize suffering of the patient.

E.     REHABILITATION
Rehabilitation is the key to maximize recovery following factures management. The aims of rehabilitation program are to restore the range of joint motion, to improve muscle strength and coordination or to return to optimal function as soon as possible. GP or family medicine should be able to instruct active exercises and to guide passive training of the joint movement to prevent joint stiffness and muscle atrophy. Therefore the basic type of rehabilitation at PUSKESMAS shows on table 5

Table 5: Basic type rehabilitation at PUSKESMAS
(modified from Green, 2001)
Excercise
Activity/Direction
1.      Stretching
Performed slowly and maintained for 20-39 seconds without aggressiveness
2.      Active ROM
The patient performs the stretching or movement
3.      Passive
The physiotherapist or outside force is applied for stretching or moving the joint
4.      Stretching
Performed at a slow, controlled rate through safe parameters of patient’s ROM

·         There are three types of stretching procedures in rehabilitation that include (1) isometric exercise which involves muscle contraction while the muscles length remain constants. This method is useful for initial rehabilitation. (2) Isotonic exercise is an increasing strength by muscle shortening and lengthening throughout the full range of motion using a constant load at variable speed. (3) Isokinetic exercise, performed with the aid of machine, restricts the amount of force applied against a resistance.

·         GP or family medicine should be able to understand balance exercise with assisted devices such as chair, railing, table, wall especially during initial phase of rehabilitation

·         GP or family medicine should be able to understand the walking aid devices using such as cane, crutch, walker and so on


Fig 8 Walking devices
   
·         GP or family medicine should be able to understand the occupational therapy especially hand injury, the aquatic therapy by reducing gravitational force for example rehabilitation in water.

·         GP or family medicine should be able to understand the adverse outcomes of the rehabilitation for example overaggressive exercises can caused tendinitis, tendon rupture, fracture, surgical wound dehiscence, or failure of surgical therapy and others.

·         And also GP or family medicine should be able to determine the referral system such as complex problem of rehabilitation, lack of treatment progression or requirement for special equipment indicate referral to physiotherapist. When ordering therapist for rehabilitation, GP or family medicine should specify the type, duration and frequency of exercises rehabilitation. The successful rehabilitation depend on GP or family medicine guidance and seriousness of the rehabilitation exercise to the patient

F.      HOME CARE &  FOLLOW UP
GP and family medicine should be able to evaluate fracture patient after definitive management at home or PUSKESMAS. He/she is able to determine the improvement of outcome, simple rehabilitation (active and passive exercises), the needing of the components of bone fracture and soft tissue healing, complications after intervention, He/she is also be able to decide the fracture patient to follow up to the Orthopaedic surgeon for a further recommendation change.

G.    COMPLICATIONS
GP and family medicine should be able to predict the immediate fractures complications for example neurologic disturbances (loss of sensory and motor function or loss of urinary/digestive tract function especially spine trauma), vascular injuries, deep venous thrombosis/fat embolism for long bone fracture, hypovolemic shock cause by bleeding for pelvic/femur/multiple fracture or crush injuries, infection in open fracture, compartment syndrome, joint effusion in intraarticular fractures.

GP and family medicine should be able to decide the delay fracture complication for example delayed union or nonunion (hypertrophic, atrophic, oligotrophic and infection nonunion), malunion, osteomyelitis acute/chronic, reflex sympathetic dystrophy, heterotophic ossification, and avascular necrosis.

GP and family medicine should be able to refer immediately after initial emergency management or refer to hospital directly.        

H.    END OF LIVE CARE 


Fig 9 Clinical and radiologic pictures


Case scenario: A-62-year female came to out-clinic of the Sardjito hospital with pathologic fracture of the right femur cause by breast metastasis in late statge. She had been treated by traditional medicine but no improvement. There were pelvic, the proximal of the left femur, and lung metastasis. The pathology from needle biopsy was adenocarcinoma.

Adenocarcinoma is a malignant cancer that treatment is not helping may make the patient feels lost and afraid. For this reason, GP and family medicine should be able to communicate some questions of patient such as:
“What’s going to happen to me? or What are my other option? or How much longer do I have? or How much pain and suffering will I have? And so on”

When GP or family medicine determines cancer diagnosed with late stage and serious or life threatening illness as like this patient, the decision of selection option is a difficulty because the influences are not only based on medical data interpretation, risks, benefits and cost of management.

The patient and his/her families will be a shock of hearing the cancer diagnosis and prognosis of serious illness in decision of the best management. For this reason, GP and family medicine should be able to explore what the patient/family expected and helping of the patient decides which of the available therapy options are best for her.

According to Singer PA, et al (1999), the GP and family medicine has an obligation to provide quality end–of-life care by: (1) adequate pain and distressing symptom management; (2) avoiding in appropriate prolongation of dying; (3) achieving a sense of control; (4) relieving unnecessary burdens; and (5) strengthening relationship with loved ones and contribution to others and continued participation and active involvement in social interaction. GP and family medicine should also be able to apply the bioethics principles such as the principle autonomy and self-determination and her importance in decision making.

The goal of the end-of-life care is making patient comfort with specific aim such as; (1) physical comfort; (2) mental and emotional needs; (3) spiritual issues, and (4) practical task. Discomfort can come from pain, breathing problem, skin irritation, digestive problem, temperature sensitivity, and fatigue.

INTERVENTION AND END OF LIFE CARE MANAGEMENT
1.      The role of palliative care
GP and family medicine should be able to relieve the patient suffering and improve the quality of living and dying. This strategy is to assist GP and family medicine and other provider in helping the patient and family physical, psychological, social, spiritual and practical issues, and the associated expectations, needs, hopes and fears.

2.      CPR and other potentially life-sustaining treatment
GP and family medicine should be able to determine CPR procedure to end of life patient by estimation of the benefit, the goals, values and beliefs. For these reasons GP and family medicine is not obliged to provide CPR that patient will not certainly benefit.

3.      Expected death at home
GP and family medicine should be able to decide staying and dying at home if the patient is a manageable option, regular care is able to provide and the provider health care team coverage in home care

4.      Euthanasia and assisted suicide
Euthanasia and assisted suicide is a criminal code in many countries include Indonesia

I.    CONCLUSION
The role of GP and family medicine in closed fractures management at PUSKESMAS includes:
1.      GP and family medicine should be able to estimate shock hypovolemic cause bleeding especially femur or pelvic fractures and to decide neurovascular disturbances.
2.      GP and family medicine should be able to manage lifesaving and limb threatening
3.      GP and family medicine should be able to perform definitive treatment of incomplete or undisplaced closed fractures by casting perfectly
4.      GP and family medicine should be able to follow up or home care and perform a simple rehabilitation. GP and family medicine should refer to orthopaedic surgeon to change strategies management or any complications during follow up
5.      GP and family medicine should be able to manage end of life care of closed pathologic fractures in a late stage at PUSKESMAS or home care

J.     REFERENCES
1.      Barnstein J editor (2003). Musculoskeletal Medicine. AAOS. Rosemeont
2.      Brinker MR edotor (2001). Review of Orthopaedic Trauma. WB Saunder Com. Philadelphia
3.      Court-Brown C and Caesar B (2006). Epidemiology of adult fractures: A review. Injury, Int.J. Care injured 37: 691-697
4.      Filiper O (2014). Epidemiology and social Buerden of the femoral neck fracture. http://www.journel-Imab-bg.org Septembre 2015.
5.      Green WB editor (2001). Essentials of Musculoskeletal Care. AAOS, Roesmemont
6.      Harveyw N, Earl S and Cooper C (2006). Epidemiology of osteoporotic fractures in America Society for Bone and Mineral Research 244-248
7.      Singer BR, McLauchlan GJ, Robinson CM, and Christie J (1998). Epidemiology of fractures in 15.000 adults. The influence of Age and Gender. JBJS 80B: 243-248
8.      van Staa TP, Denisson EM, Leufkens HGM, and Cooper C (2001). Epidemiology of fractures in England and Wales. Bone 29: 517-522

No comments:

Post a Comment